Page 2 of 10

PostPosted: June 25th, 2007, 2:47 am
by Stanley Anderson

PostPosted: June 25th, 2007, 10:01 am
by Bill

PostPosted: June 25th, 2007, 6:13 pm
by rusmeister

PostPosted: June 25th, 2007, 7:02 pm
by Stanley Anderson

PostPosted: June 28th, 2007, 4:18 pm
by jo

PostPosted: July 2nd, 2007, 10:32 pm
by VixenMage

PostPosted: July 3rd, 2007, 4:15 am
by rusmeister

PostPosted: July 4th, 2007, 1:48 am
by VixenMage
I understand what you're saying, rusmeister. *sigh* It just really bothered me, because Tolkien really was pretty much the most respectful to women of most writers in that time-- in that respect, I actually liked him better than Lewis, because in comparing Galadriel to Tinidril and Eowyn to Jane and so on, the only book that really satisfied me in that respect was Till We Have Faces. And with all the wonderfully realistic women that Tolkien put in his books, why did the directors feel the need to add to that? Really, what they did took more away than it added.

(asking at my own peril, here-- what's wrong with women in combat? If you don't want to say here or pm me, it's fine... just wondering.)

Perelandra

PostPosted: July 24th, 2007, 5:33 am
by IshmaelGonzalez

PostPosted: July 24th, 2007, 8:25 am
by rusmeister

Hman, hnakrapunt

PostPosted: August 16th, 2007, 1:55 am
by Lawrence

PostPosted: August 16th, 2007, 11:27 pm
by mitchellmckain

PostPosted: August 18th, 2007, 11:52 am
by jo

PostPosted: August 18th, 2007, 1:15 pm
by Larry W.

PostPosted: August 22nd, 2007, 4:45 pm
by UrendiMaleldil
yes! so glad that hideous strength is winning :wink: