This forum was closed on October 1st, 2010. However, the archives are open to the public and filled with vast amounts of good reading and information for you to enjoy. If you wish to meet some Wardrobians, please visit the Into the Wardrobe Facebook group.

Star Wars

Open the pod bay doors, Hnau!

Star Wars

Postby splashen » 06 Jun 2008, 22:57

If CS Lewis lived long enough, what do you think his views of the Star Wars trilogies would be?

Do you think he'd like them?

Why? or why not?
splashen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Apr 2008

Postby rusmeister » 07 Jun 2008, 02:42

I think he'd recognize George Lucas's mixed-up philosophy combining Zen Buddhism and gnostic dualism.

Yes, you can find themes that resound in Christianity, like repentance and forgiveness, but they are mostly drowned out by the non-Christian themes. The 'good' and 'dark' sides of the Force (why not 'light' vs 'dark', or 'good' vs 'evil'?), the Force as impersonal (and in the prequel manipulatable by science), being able to save yourself via special knowledge, etc etc. As a universe it is totally pessimistic and impoverished compared to Middle-Earth or Narnia. "A New Hope" seems to be valid only for the living or the gnostically 'saved' Jedi (the ones you see in shining robes at the end of ROTJ); iow, hope is centered around this life (think of spirit-Ben saying "That boy is our last hope") etc.
"Eh? Two views? There are a dozen views about everything until you know the answer. Then there's never more than one."
Bill "The Blizzard" Hingest - That Hideous Strength
User avatar
rusmeister
 
Posts: 1778
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Russia

Postby splashen » 07 Jun 2008, 02:48

rusmeister wrote:I think he'd recognize George Lucas's mixed-up philosophy combining Zen Buddhism and gnostic dualism.

Yes, you can find themes that resound in Christianity, like repentance and forgiveness, but they are mostly drowned out by the non-Christian themes. The 'good' and 'dark' sides of the Force (why not 'light' vs 'dark', or 'good' vs 'evil'?), the Force as impersonal (and in the prequel manipulatable by science), being able to save yourself via special knowledge, etc etc. As a universe it is totally pessimistic and impoverished compared to Middle-Earth or Narnia. "A New Hope" seems to be valid only for the living or the gnostically 'saved' Jedi (the ones you see in shining robes at the end of ROTJ); iow, hope is centered around this life (think of spirit-Ben saying "That boy is our last hope") etc.


Yes, Star Wars was definitely inspired by Buddhism whereas Narnia was inspired by Christianity..
splashen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Apr 2008

Re: Star Wars

Postby Pete » 07 Jun 2008, 04:20

splashen wrote:If CS Lewis lived long enough, what do you think his views of the Star Wars trilogies would be?

Do you think he'd like them?

Why? or why not?


Splashen, the Space Trilogy that this forum refers to is the C.S Lewis cosmic/space trilogy. :wink: I might be wrong, but this thread might be more suited to the general CS Lewis forum as opposed to the Space Trilogy one? :??:

About your question though... I think it's a bit of botth, there's a lot of Christian themes in there, but at the same time there's clearly influences of Buddhism, New Age religion and other stuff in there as well. Really I suppose it comes down to what you're looking for. What would Lewis have thought of it? In my opinion I think he would have enjoyed them (as films). :idea:
Member of The 2456317 Club

Image
User avatar
Pete
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 4469
Joined: Aug 1996

Re: Star Wars

Postby splashen » 07 Jun 2008, 15:34

Pete wrote:
splashen wrote:If CS Lewis lived long enough, what do you think his views of the Star Wars trilogies would be?

Do you think he'd like them?

Why? or why not?


Splashen, the Space Trilogy that this forum refers to is the C.S Lewis cosmic/space trilogy. :wink: I might be wrong, but this thread might be more suited to the general CS Lewis forum as opposed to the Space Trilogy one? :??:

About your question though... I think it's a bit of botth, there's a lot of Christian themes in there, but at the same time there's clearly influences of Buddhism, New Age religion and other stuff in there as well. Really I suppose it comes down to what you're looking for. What would Lewis have thought of it? In my opinion I think he would have enjoyed them (as films). :idea:


Yes, I think so too. With the possible exception of "The Phantom Menace."
splashen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Apr 2008

Postby Coyote Goodfellow » 07 Jun 2008, 16:12

Pete wrote
About your question though... I think it's a bit of botth, there's a lot of Christian themes in there, but at the same time there's clearly influences of Buddhism, New Age religion and other stuff in there as well. Really I suppose it comes down to what you're looking for. What would Lewis have thought of it? In my opinion I think he would have enjoyed them (as films). idea


Well, we know he enjoyed Animal Farm which was a fable based on Marxism, so presumably he could have enjoyed Star Wars as a fable based on Zen Buddhism. And he probably could have used them as inspiration for a more Christian fable of his own.
"I don't care if it is wrong," said one of the moles. "I'd do it again."
"Hush, hush" said the other animals.
User avatar
Coyote Goodfellow
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Foshan, China

Postby repectabiggle » 07 Jun 2008, 16:28

I think he'd write an article titled "The Mythopoeic Gift of George Lucas."

That is if he liked films. Which he mostly didn't.
User avatar
repectabiggle
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Sep 2007

Postby splashen » 07 Jun 2008, 18:30

repectabiggle wrote:I think he'd write an article titled "The Mythopoeic Gift of George Lucas."

That is if he liked films. Which he mostly didn't.


CS Lewis wasn't around when Star Wars came out.
splashen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Apr 2008

Postby repectabiggle » 07 Jun 2008, 18:57

Er. . .yeah. . .I know. Your question was "If CS Lewis lived long enough, what do you think his views of the Star Wars trilogies would be?" Hence my (sort of) joke, based on Lewis's essay "The Mythopoeic Gift of Rider Haggard." ;)
User avatar
repectabiggle
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Sep 2007

Postby splashen » 07 Jun 2008, 19:52

repectabiggle wrote:Er. . .yeah. . .I know. Your question was "If CS Lewis lived long enough, what do you think his views of the Star Wars trilogies would be?" Hence my (sort of) joke, based on Lewis's essay "The Mythopoeic Gift of Rider Haggard." ;)


Was it good, this essay?
splashen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Apr 2008

Postby repectabiggle » 07 Jun 2008, 21:38

It was interesting, I suppose. It's kind of fun to see Lewis, who knew and loved so much of what some might call Literature with a Capital L defend what might be (and was, and is) disregarded as pulp by some.

I really do think Lewis would have liked Lucas's world-making, and I think there is some similarity in the manner, if not the matter, of Haggard's stories and Lucas's. If you can get a hold of the essay (I think it's in On Stories and Other Essays on Literature and I know it's in the Essay Collection and Other Short Pieces), it's interesting, even if you haven't read any Haggard (King Solomon's Mines, She, and some other adventure stories).
User avatar
repectabiggle
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Sep 2007

Postby splashen » 07 Jun 2008, 22:00

repectabiggle wrote:It was interesting, I suppose. It's kind of fun to see Lewis, who knew and loved so much of what some might call Literature with a Capital L defend what might be (and was, and is) disregarded as pulp by some.

I really do think Lewis would have liked Lucas's world-making, and I think there is some similarity in the manner, if not the matter, of Haggard's stories and Lucas's. If you can get a hold of the essay (I think it's in On Stories and Other Essays on Literature and I know it's in the Essay Collection and Other Short Pieces), it's interesting, even if you haven't read any Haggard (King Solomon's Mines, She, and some other adventure stories).


I wonder what CS Lewis would have thought of the Phantom Menace?
splashen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Apr 2008

Postby repectabiggle » 07 Jun 2008, 23:31

haha well, I was mostly thinking of the old Lucas. Extending the Haggard comparison, Lewis, in one of his letters to Arthur Greeves, wrote about Haggard's sequel to She that it wasn't anything so good as the first one and it consisted mostly of the same stuff in the first book put not as good. Maybe he'd say the same about the prequel trilogy? I certainly would.
User avatar
repectabiggle
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Sep 2007

Postby splashen » 08 Jun 2008, 15:35

repectabiggle wrote:haha well, I was mostly thinking of the old Lucas. Extending the Haggard comparison, Lewis, in one of his letters to Arthur Greeves, wrote about Haggard's sequel to She that it wasn't anything so good as the first one and it consisted mostly of the same stuff in the first book put not as good. Maybe he'd say the same about the prequel trilogy? I certainly would.


Which is pretty much what I would say also.
splashen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Apr 2008

Postby Stanley Anderson » 09 Jun 2008, 15:46

I'm repeating something I've already mentioned in another thread, but it fits here so nicely, I can't resist.

As corny as parts of it are, I think the first trilogy (IV, V, and VI of course) has one of the most profound, Lewis or Scripture-like revelations about "power" ever filmed. The only problem is that virtually no one (and I'm not even sure Lucas did either) recognizes it.

What I am referring to is connected with the line in the first movie where Darth Vader and Obi are fighting and Obi says "If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine".

Before the meaning of this occurred to me, I used to think it was a "fault" in the movie -- a line that Lucas just sort of tossed in because it sounded good, but then didn't really follow up on it convincingly. After all, how powerful did he become? When one tries to think what the resolution was, the typical answers that many people suggest are that he became "powerful" in the form of Luke becoming a powerful Jedi to overcome the Empire. But that never quite seemed right to me. Luke isn't really all that powerful or noble or whatever, and he essentially fails physically at the end, even "giving in" to his anger when he was not supposed to, and we see this weakness enacted when the Emperor is in the act of killing him.

And even the form of the statement "more powerful than you can possibly imagine" seems to be a bit over the top. More powerful than Vader can possibly imagine? I bet he could imagine pretty powerful things -- death stars, thousands of battle ships, legions of soldiers, etc. Could Obi summon powers of galactic size, perhaps? Even if he could, this was still "imaginable" to Darth Vader, however unlikely it might be.

And yet it turns out that the line was perfectly true. Obi "became" literally more powerful than Vader could possilby imagine (at the time), not because he could summon powers greater than Vader could imagine, but because Vader was on the "other side" and could not conceive of the idea that it would be he, Vader himself, that would be the one to overturn the emperor and toss him into the inferno.

What no numerical amount of external "powers" could overcome in trying to conquer Vader "from the outside", Obi's training of Vader's son, Luke, eventually worked "from the inside" like a tiny frail wilting seed of love to fianlly turn Vader into the very force that would overcome the Empire. When he sees his son being killed by the Emperor he suddenly becomes something he could not possibly have imagined when he stuck down Obi in the first movie.

To me, the working out of that line in the first movie is truly a wonderful example of the Scriptural illustration of God's power being manifested in the weak things of the world. There were of course many silly and corny aspects of the movies, but this one key line and its resolution outweigh them all and is, to me, not unlike the "power" that Lewis shows us in the "internal" resolution of, say, Orual's hatred and unbelief in Till We Have Faces, or the idea of the inside of the lowly stable in Last Battle being bigger than the whole world outside the stable. I think Lewis would have very much liked that aspect of the movies.

--Stanley
…on a night of rain Frodo smelled a sweet fragrance on the air and heard the sound of singing that came over the water. And then it seemed to him that as in his dream in the house of Bombadil, the grey rain-curtain turned all to silver glass and was rolled back, and he beheld white shores and beyond them a fair green country under a swift sunrise.
User avatar
Stanley Anderson
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3251
Joined: Aug 1996
Location: Southern California

Next

Return to The Space Trilogy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered members and 1 guest