This forum was closed on October 1st, 2010. However, the archives are open to the public and filled with vast amounts of good reading and information for you to enjoy. If you wish to meet some Wardrobians, please visit the Into the Wardrobe Facebook group.

Till We Have Faces any Thoughts?

Comprising most of Lewis' writings.
Forum rules
Please keep all discussion on topic and in line with our code of conduct.

Re: re: Till We Have Faces any Thoughts?

Postby NescaPoulita » July 6th, 2008, 5:35 am

User avatar
NescaPoulita
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Mexico City

Re: re: Till We Have Faces any Thoughts?

Postby repectabiggle » July 7th, 2008, 1:50 pm

User avatar
repectabiggle
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Sep 2007

Postby nomad » July 30th, 2008, 1:31 am

member of the 2456317 club
"Well," said Pooh, "what I like best -- " and then he had to stop and think. Because although Eating Honey was a very good thing to do, there was a moment just before you began to eat it which was better than when you were, but he didn't know what it was called.
User avatar
nomad
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: I wish I knew

Postby Stanley Anderson » July 30th, 2008, 3:02 pm

The various psychological interpretations of whether she only thought she was so ugly or not are possibly interesting as subjects themselves, but for the purposes of understanding the book and its author's intentions, I think it unnecessarily complicates the issues presented -- and the idea even negates certain things that I think Lewis fully intended to be there. Thus, it is clear that people around her DID think she was ugly when she is younger. And she doesn't take on the veil until later so her ugliness was still apparent at least for a while. To remove the physical ugliness in a "modern" reading of trying to turn it into a psychological understanding only is to remove the mythic element where the physical ugliness "becomes" that psychological understanding in a sense.

One might also suggest that Psyche is not really as beautiful as she is said to be, but only that people "wanted" to believe she was. Or one might say that because Psyche was so beautiful, people only thought Orual ugly in comparison. But then what about Redival, with her sort of "in-between" appearance? No, to me, we must simply accept what the story tells us about Orual.

And getting rid of the physical ugliness would only render the scenes where she "becomes" beautiful in the wall frescos (is that the right word?) rather meaningless and pointless. And besides, in the story, there is no psychological "resolution" of her, say, finally "accepting" her ugliness and then realizing that she wasn't as physically ugly as she thought all along, as we might expect to see in a modern novel about internal mental states and such. So a supposition about her not "really" being ugly after all serves no purpose in reading and understanding the story.

By the way, I wrote above that we must simply accept what the story tells us about Orual. And this means that we must accept the mystery and "mythic" inscrutability of the insistence later that Orual in some sense "is" Psyche. On the other hand, ironically, the place where "accepting what the story tells us" really does lead us to "wrong" conclusions is in Orual's very own words about her psychological state --ie, we are totally convinced, and agree with her viewpoint, in the first half of the book by her insistence of her "love" for Psyche and her justification for her anger at the gods. It is only later that we discover (along with her) in her revelation that it was really only selfishness and pride that deceived her and made Orual think her distorted impressions could ever be called "love" or "justified anger at the gods".

One might then argue, "ok, if Orual was wrong about her impression of what her own feelings of love were, why couldn't she also be wrong about how ugly she "really" was?". And the answer is that her psychological error about love and justified anger were "resolved" in the book by her enlightenment about her internal state -- thus, the whole purpose for the name of the book -- while the physical ugliness was "resolved" in a very different "mythical" way (but obviously connected mythically and symbolically to that internal psychological struggle about love and anger).

Anyway, so my opinion is that however interesting it might be to speculate on just how ugly Orual really was, it is quite irrelevant to the purposes of the story at best and possibly even destructive to some of its mythical and structural elements to imagine that she wasn't really all that ugly and that it was "all in her mind". There were other issues that were "all in her mind" that the book was "really" dealing with all along.

--Stanley
…on a night of rain Frodo smelled a sweet fragrance on the air and heard the sound of singing that came over the water. And then it seemed to him that as in his dream in the house of Bombadil, the grey rain-curtain turned all to silver glass and was rolled back, and he beheld white shores and beyond them a fair green country under a swift sunrise.
User avatar
Stanley Anderson
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3251
Joined: Aug 1996
Location: Southern California

Postby Tuke » July 30th, 2008, 8:59 pm

"The 'great golden chain of Concord' has united the whole of Edmund Spenser's world.... Nothing is repressed; nothing is insubordinate. To read him is to grow in mental health." The Allegory Of Love (Faerie Queene)

2 Corinthians IV.17 The Weight of Glory
User avatar
Tuke
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 971
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Florida

Postby lissy » August 5th, 2008, 2:00 pm

User avatar
lissy
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: The midwestern region of the U S of A

Postby Sven » August 5th, 2008, 7:19 pm

Lissy, Lewis often used images from paganism in his fiction. In addition to TWHF, there are Venus and Mars showing up in the Space Trilogy, and Pan in the Narniad. Two essays of his that you might find of interest in this matter are 'Is Theism Important?' and 'Religion Without Dogma' (both collected in the book God in the Dock), as well as the book Mere Christianity, where he talks about corn gods.
Rat! he found breath to whisper, shaking. Are you afraid?
Afraid? murmured the Rat, his eyes shining with unutterable love.
Afraid! Of Him? O, never, never! And yet -- and yet -- O, Mole, I am afraid!
Then the two animals, crouching to the earth, bowed their heads and did worship.
User avatar
Sven
 
Posts: 2883
Joined: Aug 1996
Location: Greenbelt, MD, near Washington DC

Postby lissy » August 5th, 2008, 8:01 pm

Thanks, I'll definently look for those essays. :read: This aspect of Lewis' writing is really interesting to me.
User avatar
lissy
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: The midwestern region of the U S of A

Postby Tuke » August 5th, 2008, 11:04 pm

Many, if not all, editions of TWHF include a "Note" from Lewis identifying his source and explaining Cupid & Psyche. Also, he discusses TWHF in The Letters of CSL. However, the best, most thorough summary, explication and analysis I've seen is in Walter Hooper's CSL: Companion & Guide.
"The 'great golden chain of Concord' has united the whole of Edmund Spenser's world.... Nothing is repressed; nothing is insubordinate. To read him is to grow in mental health." The Allegory Of Love (Faerie Queene)

2 Corinthians IV.17 The Weight of Glory
User avatar
Tuke
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 971
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Florida

Postby Lara » September 8th, 2008, 3:05 pm

Has the chat room joined the choir invisible?
Lara
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Jan 2006

Postby Lara » September 8th, 2008, 3:06 pm

sorry, I should have started a new topic. Ive been gone so long it was like driving in LA for the first time.:)
Lara
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Jan 2006

Re: Till We Have Faces any Thoughts?

Postby nomad » December 14th, 2008, 12:36 am

member of the 2456317 club
"Well," said Pooh, "what I like best -- " and then he had to stop and think. Because although Eating Honey was a very good thing to do, there was a moment just before you began to eat it which was better than when you were, but he didn't know what it was called.
User avatar
nomad
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: I wish I knew

Previous

Return to Apologetics & Other Works

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered members and 15 guests

cron