by WolfVanZandt » December 26th, 2006, 10:28 am
Actually, the Bible does emphasize that tt is the only source of general revelation. Several times, Paul warned that, if any one comes with any gospel different other than the one brought by the Apostles (and I don't mean popes - I mean the people who walked with Jesus), then don't accept it.
I noticed when Stanley was writing about tradition, he mentioned that the producers of Tradition did so by Authority and grace. Ignoring the fact that no one but other men gave them the authority - he failed to mention inspiration. What makes me trust the scripture is that I'm am convinced that it is inspired by the Holy Spirit. It is markable that he left that point out.
But taking the Marian dogmas as an example - the Bible, no where points to Mary. She's not a major player in the Bible. Rasing her up to the position she occupies in the Catholic church and a position that she doesn't share (people pray to Mary, people venerate Mary) does not point to Jesus - it points to Mary. It points so strogly to Mary that I have had discussions with people who say things lie, "Never send a son to do a mother's work.".The church should always point to Jesus - it should never weaken that ponting finger tha points straight at Jesus.
Why should we care what other people think? The strongest (and very last) demand place don the church by the Earthly Jesus Christ was, "Go ye unto all the world." Our mission is to win the world to Jesus. I've found that, with the people I evangelize, if I preach the church, I've lost them already. If I preach Jesus, I have some hope of getting through to them. They know altogether enough about the church to last them a lifetime. You cannot separate the church into bad chuch and good church. The church is responsible for it all.
Stanley, that you see more and more evidence of your new tradition as you go along is quite predctable psychologically. Your mind is restructuring around your new beliefs. It doesn't necessariy mean that what you're seeing is actually there. Things like cognitive dissonance practically assures that, if you don't guard against it, you will begin validating your choices simply because you made them. I see that, rather than you learning the error of your old ways, you're heavy into learning new errors.