This forum was closed on October 1st, 2010. However, the archives are open to the public and filled with vast amounts of good reading and information for you to enjoy. If you wish to meet some Wardrobians, please visit the Into the Wardrobe Facebook group.

Shot at Dawn

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby Alan » February 10th, 2006, 1:18 pm

This product does not require batteries
User avatar
Alan
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Merrie England

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby robsia » February 10th, 2006, 2:19 pm

Ah - I think the wisdom of Blackadder is called for here:

The Causes of WWI


Baldrick: The thing is: The way I see it, these days there's a war on, right? and, ages ago, there wasn't a war on, right? So, there must have been a moment when there not being a war on went away, right? and there being a war on came along. So, what I want to know is: How did we get from the one case of affairs to the other case of affairs?



Edmund: Do you mean "Why did the war start?"


Baldrick: Yeah.


George: The war started because of the vile Hun and his villainous empire-building.


Edmund: George, the British Empire at present covers a quarter of the globe, while the German Empire consists of a small sausage factory in Tanganyika. I hardly think that we can be entirely absolved of blame on the imperialistic front.


George: Oh, no, sir, absolutely not. [aside, to Baldick] Mad as a bicycle!


Baldrick: I heard that it started when a bloke called Archie Duke shot an ostrich 'cause he was hungry.


Edmund: I think you mean it started when the Archduke of Austro-Hungary got shot.


Baldrick: Nah, there was definitely an ostrich involved, sir.


Edmund: Well, possibly. But the real reason for the whole thing was that it was too much effort not to have a war.


George: By Golly, this is interesting; I always loved history...


Edmund: You see, Baldrick, in order to prevent war in Europe, two superblocs developed: us, the French and the Russians on one side, and the Germans and Austro-Hungary on the other. The idea was to have two vast opposing armies, each acting as the other's deterrent. That way there could never be a war.


Baldrick: But this is a sort of a war, isn't it, sir?


Edmund: Yes, that's right. You see, there was a tiny flaw in the plan.


George: What was that, sir?


Edmund: It was bollocks.


Baldrick: So the poor old ostrich died for nothing.
User avatar
robsia
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3732
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Incognito no longer

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby Alan » February 10th, 2006, 3:24 pm

Ah .... Blackadder goes fourth. The last episode was possibly the finest comedy programme ever made. I can remember how moved I was after watching it. I didn't complain about the licence fee for over two days. My all time world record. :pleased:
This product does not require batteries
User avatar
Alan
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Merrie England

Re: re: Shot at Dawn

Postby Marcus_P_Hagen » February 10th, 2006, 8:30 pm

User avatar
Marcus_P_Hagen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Mar 1999
Location: Bloomington, MN [USA]

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby AllanS » February 10th, 2006, 9:56 pm

User avatar
AllanS
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Hobart Tasmania

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby robsia » February 10th, 2006, 10:48 pm

User avatar
robsia
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3732
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Incognito no longer

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby AllanS » February 10th, 2006, 11:09 pm

User avatar
AllanS
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Hobart Tasmania

Re: Shot at Dawn

Postby hammurabi2000 » February 11th, 2006, 12:35 am

User avatar
hammurabi2000
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 229
Joined: Aug 2005

Re: re: Shot at Dawn

Postby Theo » February 11th, 2006, 11:10 am

User avatar
Theo
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 777
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby robsia » February 11th, 2006, 11:21 am

User avatar
robsia
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3732
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Incognito no longer

Re: re: Shot at Dawn

Postby jo » February 11th, 2006, 12:49 pm

"I saw it begin,” said the Lord Digory. “I did not think I would live to see it die"

User avatar
jo
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 5167
Joined: Aug 1999
Location: somewhere with lots of pink

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby AllanS » February 11th, 2006, 9:30 pm

Hi Jo.

Yeah. I thought I had a handle on its rudeness. But these two were quite convincing. Maybe its Rudeness Rating varies regionally?
User avatar
AllanS
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Hobart Tasmania

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby robsia » February 11th, 2006, 10:46 pm

User avatar
robsia
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3732
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Incognito no longer

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby jo » February 12th, 2006, 9:52 am

It's still QUITE rude though :). It is a euphemism for testicles, after all (in fact not even a euphemism, as it's considerably ruder than the word itself).
"I saw it begin,” said the Lord Digory. “I did not think I would live to see it die"

User avatar
jo
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 5167
Joined: Aug 1999
Location: somewhere with lots of pink

re: Shot at Dawn

Postby robsia » February 12th, 2006, 10:05 am

Oh yes, it is definitely rude. But less than the others.
User avatar
robsia
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3732
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Incognito no longer

Previous

Return to Religion, Science, and Philosophy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered members and 6 guests

cron