This forum was closed on October 1st, 2010. However, the archives are open to the public and filled with vast amounts of good reading and information for you to enjoy. If you wish to meet some Wardrobians, please visit the Into the Wardrobe Facebook group.

A Question About Remarriage (take II)

Postby Guest » March 22nd, 2007, 4:36 pm

Guest
 

Postby Karen » March 22nd, 2007, 5:10 pm

Last edited by Karen on March 22nd, 2007, 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I have always imagined that paradise will be a kind of library. -- Jorge Luis Borges
User avatar
Karen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3733
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Postby JRosemary » March 22nd, 2007, 5:12 pm

User avatar
JRosemary
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey

Postby JRosemary » March 22nd, 2007, 5:22 pm

User avatar
JRosemary
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey

Postby Guest » March 22nd, 2007, 6:20 pm

Guest
 

Postby JRosemary » March 22nd, 2007, 7:36 pm

Last edited by JRosemary on March 22nd, 2007, 7:54 pm, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
JRosemary
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey

Postby JRosemary » March 22nd, 2007, 7:36 pm

Dual post.
User avatar
JRosemary
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey

Postby Guest » March 22nd, 2007, 7:59 pm

Guest
 

Postby Leslie » March 23rd, 2007, 1:00 am

Paul begins I Cor 7 with "Now for the matters you wrote about ..." He was apparently responding to questions the Corinthians had about marriage. As has been already pointed out, everyone thought the end was near, and it seems to me that some people were confused about the place of marriage in the end times -- why get married and have children if the world is about to end?

The impression I get from Paul's remarks about "mixed" marriages is that some thought that if only one partner in a marriage had become a Christian, the marriage was void, and the believing spouse must leave the non-believing spouse. Paul was correcting this belief by saying, no, the marriage is still valid and the children legitimate -- I don't know the Greek -- is "illegitimate' a possible gloss of the word translated as "unclean?" And I think in verses 10-11, he was saying that the standards governing marriage and divorce still apply. [/i]
"What are you laughing at?"
"At myself. My little puny self," said Phillipa.
--Rumer Godden, In This House of Brede
User avatar
Leslie
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1814
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Guest » March 23rd, 2007, 1:19 pm

Guest
 

Postby JRosemary » March 23rd, 2007, 1:28 pm

User avatar
JRosemary
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey

Postby Karen » March 23rd, 2007, 1:42 pm

I have always imagined that paradise will be a kind of library. -- Jorge Luis Borges
User avatar
Karen
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3733
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Postby Carly » March 23rd, 2007, 9:10 pm

You raise an excellent question, Karen. What if one is trying to live as a Christian in a post-Christian world--a world in which even fellow Christians, including someone one might happen to have been married to, take their covenants lightly?

And I also have a question for Dan--in your church's view, does abandonment by a fellow Christian, followed by adultery (through remarriage) free the abandoned spouse to remarry? How does your church justify this stance in light of what Karen and others have said?

Everyone, your input and interaction are awesome--I'm learning a lot from all of you!
Winning over the world--one person at a time!
User avatar
Carly
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby Guest » March 23rd, 2007, 9:34 pm

Guest
 

Postby tangent » March 23rd, 2007, 10:14 pm

tangent
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Aug 2002

PreviousNext

Return to Religion, Science, and Philosophy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered members and 69 guests