This forum was closed on October 1st, 2010. However, the archives are open to the public and filled with vast amounts of good reading and information for you to enjoy. If you wish to meet some Wardrobians, please visit the Into the Wardrobe Facebook group.

The philosophy of science

Re: The philosophy of science

Postby postodave » January 8th, 2009, 12:44 am

So I drew my sword and got ready
But the lamb ran away with the crown
postodave
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Oct 2004

Re: The philosophy of science

Postby mitchellmckain » January 8th, 2009, 7:01 pm

mitchellmckain
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Jul 2007

Re: The philosophy of science

Postby Kolbitar » January 8th, 2009, 10:48 pm

The man who lives in contact with what he believes to be a living Church is a man always expecting to meet Plato and Shakespeare tomorrow at breakfast. He is always expecting to see some truth that he has never seen before. --Chesterton

Sober Inebriation: http://soberinebriationblog.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Kolbitar
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 667
Joined: Feb 2000
Location: Exile

Re: The philosophy of science

Postby Bluegoat » January 9th, 2009, 3:37 pm

User avatar
Bluegoat
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Nova Scotia

Re: The philosophy of science

Postby mitchellmckain » January 10th, 2009, 7:41 pm

mitchellmckain
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Jul 2007

Re: The philosophy of science

Postby postodave » January 10th, 2009, 11:39 pm

So I drew my sword and got ready
But the lamb ran away with the crown
postodave
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Oct 2004

Re: The philosophy of science

Postby Kolbitar » January 11th, 2009, 12:36 pm

The man who lives in contact with what he believes to be a living Church is a man always expecting to meet Plato and Shakespeare tomorrow at breakfast. He is always expecting to see some truth that he has never seen before. --Chesterton

Sober Inebriation: http://soberinebriationblog.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Kolbitar
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 667
Joined: Feb 2000
Location: Exile

Re: The philosophy of science

Postby mitchellmckain » January 12th, 2009, 6:02 pm

Response to Kolbitar removed by author as off topic and transfered to the thread "The Nature of Morality".
Last edited by mitchellmckain on January 13th, 2009, 1:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
mitchellmckain
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Jul 2007

Re: The philosophy of science

Postby postodave » January 12th, 2009, 8:10 pm

I think you are now well into another topic of debate. I think this ought to be a separate thread. I am finding this very interesting. Am I right in thinking the sides in the debate would be:
Kolbytar - morality is objective. Certain things are right or wrong regardless of what people think about the matter.
Mitch - right and wrong are subjective terms and the only way to establish a morality is through consensus.
If so it seems to me - But no, I won't enter the fray. I'll just invite one of you to move this over and join in as I see fit if you do move it.
So I drew my sword and got ready
But the lamb ran away with the crown
postodave
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Oct 2004

Previous

Return to Religion, Science, and Philosophy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered members and 20 guests

cron