The 2456317 Club

[queenbookworm]

So like i said, lets stick to the wardrobe=Lucy.

[john]

So like i said, lets stick to the wardrobe=Lucy.

Okay, here you go. This is about the best I can do on such short notice:

[Stanley Anderson]

So like i said, lets stick to the wardrobe=Lucy.

Okay, here you go. This is about the best I can do on such short notice:

But what is that toaster-like monster with the two eyes and the long "stick" nose that is positioned above the word "Lucy"?

--Stanley

[queenbookworm]

That is the wardrobe, silly! /me laughs

[Stanley Anderson]

That is the wardrobe, silly! /me laughs

So that's what a War Drobe looks like, eh? Are they related to War Droids, I wonder?

--Stanley

[john]

With the quality being what is, I would think you could call it a What Drobe?

[Stanley Anderson]

So like i said, lets stick to the wardrobe=Lucy.

Okay, here you go. This is about the best I can do on such short notice:

But what is that toaster-like monster with the two eyes and the long "stick" nose that is positioned above the word "Lucy"?

--Stanley

The War Drobe looks as though he (she?) is getting ready to eat Lucy. Which suddenly makes think (on a semi-serious point now) of a fanciful idea: what about the symbolic image of Lucy as sort of Jonah-like character being swallowed by the Whaledrobe, only this time when the Whaledrobe spat her back out to her brothers and sister, they did not, like Nineveh with Jonah, believe her. One can even think of the rain that kept the children indoors at the beginning as not unlike the storm that resulted in Jonah being cast overboard. And perhaps Lucy's gourd and worm were the joyful discovery and subsequent betrayal of her brother Edmund's entry into Narnia when he denied it to Susan and Peter?

Well, now I'm pushing this waaay too far, but it is fun to think about anyway.
--Stanley

[john]

Okay, I think I need to point out that I did this drawing very quickly in Photoshop last night...and I'm not a good artist...so there you have it. ;)

[magpie]

Okay, I think I need to point out that I did this drawing very quickly in Photoshop last night...and I'm not a good artist...so there you have it. ;)

Either that or it is indeed a toaster offering us more philosophical "bread" to chew on. ;)

[Stanley Anderson]

Okay, I think I need to point out that I did this drawing very quickly in Photoshop last night...and I'm not a good artist...so there you have it. ;)

I probably need to point out that my original post about the drawing was meant to be a self-mocking dig at myself (I hope in perhaps the same tone you intended with your drawing in the first place), implying that in relation to the simplistic style of the drawing, I simplistically also was too dim to realize what was being portrayed. But of course it was perfectly clear all along what the drawing was meant to be. Just me failing to resist temptation.

I quite enjoyed the drawing in its minimalist manner actually! (which is why I took the time to play with it in my replies:-)

--Stanley

[john]

I quite enjoyed the drawing in its minimalist manner actually! (which is why I took the time to play with it in my replies:-)

*grin* Glad you like it. ;)

[Boyd Britton]

How about something with a little more oomph (not to mention soul, and oldies appeal for the likes of CW Butch and me):

"634-5789, That's my number!" by the one and only Wilson Pickett?

[Carrie]

How about something with a little more oomph (not to mention soul, and oldies appeal for the likes of CW Butch and me):

"634-5789, That's my number!" by the one and only Wilson Pickett?

Hey, if you want to write something else, you are more than welcome to it. I was just following suggestion (and copying a song that I actually happened to know...). Besides, you have to love the cheesy 80s beat and the terrible lyrics. :D

[Summer]

Brand new member of the club! I never really thought the reading order mattered much. However, last night I was talking to a bunch of the students about the new movie, and the vast majority of them had never read CoN. A few of them had tried to plow through MN first, and had gotten hopelessly bogged down.

I advised them all to read LWW, and decided that, yes, it matters what order you read the books in!

[Solomons Song]

John is the only forum administrator I know that endorses the starting of threads about absolutely nothing. All the other forums I know have admins that rant and rave when a pointless thread is created. It usually involves the mods cracking down and and a global sticky telling everyone to re-read the forum rules.