This forum was closed on October 1st, 2010. However, the archives are open to the public and filled with vast amounts of good reading and information for you to enjoy. If you wish to meet some Wardrobians, please visit the Into the Wardrobe Facebook group.

If they changed the order BACK...

Please don't close the door behind you.

If they changed the order BACK...

Postby glumPuddle » May 2nd, 2007, 4:05 am

<---Click
Chronological Order: 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956
User avatar
glumPuddle
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: United States

Postby Larry W. » May 2nd, 2007, 10:52 am

The Harper Collins edition of the Narnia books which I own is in chronological order, which some readers have understandably disputed. But it is a much better edition than the Macmillan paperbacks printed in the published order during the 1970's with their cheap quality paper and cut down illustrations, which were an insult to Pauline Baynes. That was the first set of Narnia book that I owned, which I replaced with the Harper Collins edition a few years ago. It's more important to me to have a set of books printed on quality paper with the complete illustrations than to have them numbered in what is considered by some to be the correct order. At least I now have the complete seven books in a respectable hardcover set. It has all of the original pictures (although not in color), and the text is printed and on fine paper which won't turn yellow in less than ten years.

If it irritates people so much to have the "wrong" numbers on the spines of the books they could have volumes of their set sent off to a bindery and have the books rebound with "Volume One" printed on the outside cover along with the title of The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, "Volume Two" with Prince Caspian, and so on... :smile: Libraries will sometimes have books rebound, but they usually wait for their copies
to wear out first. I think mine will last for a very long time, much longer than that other set of thirty years ago that I gave away.

Larry W.
Larry W.
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1721
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Western Michigan

Postby Leslie » May 2nd, 2007, 11:37 am

Larry, I would agree with you completely if we were only talking about people who already know the story in its originally published order.

My concern is for new readers of CON -- I think it very important that they read the story in 2456317 order. When I gave a boxed set to my husband's niece in the early 80s, I was horrified to see the books in the new order, and I enclosed a note urging her to read them in 2456317 order. But I can't do that for everyone. :wink:

I'll gladly sign the petition.
"What are you laughing at?"
"At myself. My little puny self," said Phillipa.
--Rumer Godden, In This House of Brede
User avatar
Leslie
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1814
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby A#minor » May 2nd, 2007, 1:53 pm

Count me in! I'll sign a petition!
"My brain and this world don't fit each other, and there's an end of it!" - G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
A#minor
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 7323
Joined: May 2005
Location: Georgia, USA

Postby Lady Rebecca » May 2nd, 2007, 4:25 pm

"Well, you know how it feels if you begin hoping for something that you want desperately badly; you almost fight against the hope because it is too good to be true; you've been disappointed so often before. But it was no good trying to throttle this hope. It might - really, really, it just might be true. So many odd things had happened already." - from the magician's nephew

Image

Member 2456317 Club
User avatar
Lady Rebecca
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: East of the sun, and West of the moon

Postby glumPuddle » May 2nd, 2007, 7:36 pm

<---Click
Chronological Order: 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956
User avatar
glumPuddle
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: United States

Postby Esther » May 2nd, 2007, 8:59 pm

Member of the 2456317 club
User avatar
Esther
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Southern California

Postby Larry W. » May 3rd, 2007, 2:59 am

Larry W.
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1721
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Western Michigan

Postby Guest » May 3rd, 2007, 5:10 pm

Guest
 

Postby carol » May 6th, 2007, 3:50 am

Image
carol
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Apr 1999
Location: New Zealand

Postby rusmeister » May 6th, 2007, 1:48 pm

"Eh? Two views? There are a dozen views about everything until you know the answer. Then there's never more than one."
Bill "The Blizzard" Hingest - That Hideous Strength
User avatar
rusmeister
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1795
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Russia

Postby Esther » May 8th, 2007, 7:22 pm

Member of the 2456317 club
User avatar
Esther
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Southern California

Postby glumPuddle » May 9th, 2007, 5:08 am

Here's my point, Esther...

Lewis may have said that chronalogical was best, but that is irrelevant. The fact is, he did NOT change the order. He was alive for 7 years afer finishing the Chronicles and he never asked that the order be changed.

This is not a question of "which order is best?" The question is "should the order have been changed?" Lewis apparently thought that chronalogical was better, but he apparently didn't think the order should be changed.

For example...
If someone asked me what order they should watch the Star Wars films in, I would not hesitate to say they should watch them in the order they were made (Episode 4 first). However, I would be very upset if George Lucas actually changed the order so that Episode 4 said Episode 1.
<---Click
Chronological Order: 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956
User avatar
glumPuddle
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: United States

Postby Guest » May 9th, 2007, 1:02 pm

Guest
 

Postby Ticket2theMoon » May 9th, 2007, 10:26 pm

I know Lewis said chronological is best, but he didn't write them that way. The ones that are "prequels" are written as prequels--they reveal things in a way that's supposed to make you say, "Ohhhhhh! I get it now!" Same thing with Star Wars. The moment when we hear, "Anakin Skywalker, meet Obi Wan Kenobi" is supposed to be significant, just like Obi Wan's first line being "I have a bad feeling about this" makes us laugh a little. Those are things that are meaningless if Episode 1 is really the first episode you ever watch. I'm preaching to the choir, I know, because nobody is arguing with me, but it's one of the those soapboxes I have that I can't let pass.
===========================================================================================

It is with words as with sunbeams, the more they are condensed, the deeper they burn. --Robert Southey (1774-1843)

Image
User avatar
Ticket2theMoon
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: May 2006
Location: Lantern Waste

Next

Return to The Chronicles of Narnia

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered members and 14 guests

cron