This forum was closed on October 1st, 2010. However, the archives are open to the public and filled with vast amounts of good reading and information for you to enjoy. If you wish to meet some Wardrobians, please visit the Into the Wardrobe Facebook group.

Book 4, Chapters 3 & 4

One chapter per week study of a book that profoundly influenced C. S. Lewis.

Book 4, Chapters 3 & 4

Postby magpie » December 22nd, 2005, 9:19 pm

"Love is the will to extend one's self in order to nurture one's own or another's spiritual growth."
M. Scott Peck

Member of the Religious Tolerance Cabal of the Wardrobe
User avatar
magpie
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1096
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota

Re: Book 4, Chapters 3 & 4

Postby Kolbitar » December 31st, 2005, 2:55 pm

::This argument only holds if one accepts the premise that happiness and the good are interchangeable essences, a premise which not only flies in the face of a great deal of human experience, but one which also has denigrating implications for the "man of sorrows and acquainted with grief," the true God (not merely a god) who "became flesh and dwelt among us."

Hold on there, this is a common misunderstanding -- one which would have the Founding Fathers, with their "pursuit of hapiness," as complete subjectivists.

That is not what adherents to the perennial philosophy mean by "happiness": we moderns have warped it's meaning to resemble our own immediate-pleasure-seeking lives.

"(T)his insight...Boethius...expresses in an oft repeated characterization of happiness as "a life made perfect by the possession in aggregate of all good things." So conceived, happiness is not a particular good itself, but the sum of goods." --Mortimer Adler

There's a vast difference between being happy at one particular moment -- having the psychological contentment accompanying the possession of a good -- and the quality of happiness pursuing a good life. The latter is a disposition, a habitual inclination, and does not primarily refer to the fleeting emotions of sorrow, anger, contented happiness, etc. The opposite of a happy life as Boethius, Aristotle, or other natural philosophers conceive it, is a tragic life. To explain what Boethius means about our own rewards and punishments, we have to make a further distinction, because as you note Christ did not live a life replete, as a long string of happy emotions -- Boethius does not have this in mind. Nor could we call Christ's life happy, as opposed to tragic, as a whole. What then does Boethius have in mind? The answer is to make the distinction between limited and unlimited goods: those not within our power to possess, and those that are -- outside circumstances, and inner dispositions. The opposite of happiness in this sense is neurosis. A happy person in this sense can have unhappy feelings yet still have an inner disposition which enables him to make virtuous decisions (and become a god). What of the self-deluded who think their possession of one good to the exclusion of all others makes them happy? Well, as Mill said, “…if the fool…(is) of a different opinion, it is because (he) only know(s) (his) own side of the question. The other party to the comparison knows both sides.” It would be self-evident to anyone thus shown, experientially, the “other side” (the wicked shown what it means to be good) that he was a “fool.”

Jesse
User avatar
Kolbitar
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 667
Joined: Feb 2000
Location: Exile

re: Book 4, Chapters 3 & 4

Postby magpie » January 25th, 2006, 7:28 pm

"Love is the will to extend one's self in order to nurture one's own or another's spiritual growth."
M. Scott Peck

Member of the Religious Tolerance Cabal of the Wardrobe
User avatar
magpie
Wardrobian
 
Posts: 1096
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota


Return to The Consolation of Philosophy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered members and 1 guest

cron