Page 4 of 4

Re: The philosophy of science

PostPosted: January 8th, 2009, 12:44 am
by postodave

Re: The philosophy of science

PostPosted: January 8th, 2009, 7:01 pm
by mitchellmckain

Re: The philosophy of science

PostPosted: January 8th, 2009, 10:48 pm
by Kolbitar

Re: The philosophy of science

PostPosted: January 9th, 2009, 3:37 pm
by Bluegoat

Re: The philosophy of science

PostPosted: January 10th, 2009, 7:41 pm
by mitchellmckain

Re: The philosophy of science

PostPosted: January 10th, 2009, 11:39 pm
by postodave

Re: The philosophy of science

PostPosted: January 11th, 2009, 12:36 pm
by Kolbitar

Re: The philosophy of science

PostPosted: January 12th, 2009, 6:02 pm
by mitchellmckain
Response to Kolbitar removed by author as off topic and transfered to the thread "The Nature of Morality".

Re: The philosophy of science

PostPosted: January 12th, 2009, 8:10 pm
by postodave
I think you are now well into another topic of debate. I think this ought to be a separate thread. I am finding this very interesting. Am I right in thinking the sides in the debate would be:
Kolbytar - morality is objective. Certain things are right or wrong regardless of what people think about the matter.
Mitch - right and wrong are subjective terms and the only way to establish a morality is through consensus.
If so it seems to me - But no, I won't enter the fray. I'll just invite one of you to move this over and join in as I see fit if you do move it.