Page 2 of 5

PostPosted: February 6th, 2007, 1:35 am
by A#minor

PostPosted: February 6th, 2007, 2:56 am
by Lirenel

PostPosted: February 6th, 2007, 11:46 am
by UrendiMaleldil

PostPosted: February 6th, 2007, 11:58 pm
by Esther

PostPosted: February 7th, 2007, 1:20 am
by A#minor
Esther, what you say about Gresham certainly does make sense. Also we might keep in mind that perhaps he is "picking his battles." He may have convinced the director/producers to give up an even worse idea, but had to compromise and not make a fuss over small changes.
If one complains about every little thing, eventually people stop listening. Maybe Gresham is choosing to be an influential voice about bigger changes, and to do that he has to sacrifice the little things.
Just a thought.

PostPosted: February 7th, 2007, 1:23 pm
by UrendiMaleldil

PostPosted: February 7th, 2007, 9:31 pm
by Aleena

PostPosted: February 7th, 2007, 11:29 pm
by UrendiMaleldil

PostPosted: February 7th, 2007, 11:41 pm
by Erekose

PostPosted: February 8th, 2007, 12:43 am
by David Jack

PostPosted: February 8th, 2007, 1:22 pm
by UrendiMaleldil

PostPosted: February 8th, 2007, 4:13 pm
by rusmeister

PostPosted: February 8th, 2007, 4:37 pm
by UrendiMaleldil

I can't believe this rudeness

PostPosted: February 9th, 2007, 5:45 am
by carol

PostPosted: February 9th, 2007, 5:52 am
by Pete