by David » March 4th, 2006, 2:05 pm
Yes, Orientalism is a good book, though a somewhat challenging read. Said says that the East represents the "Other" to Westerners and in literature and art comes to be a symbol for everything that is strange, exotic, and different. This was true for the Far East as well as the Middle East, but since Europeans had more contact with the Middle East (and it was closer), they tended to write and paint more about it.
I tend to see Calormen in this light. It is a place of otherness. It is the moral and cultural opposite of Narnia.
Part of the problem in this day and age is that we tend to think of all things in terms of fear. Someone, for example, who does not approve of homosexuality is called "homophobic," someone who fears homosexuality. Fear may have nothing to do with it, it may simply be a question of ethics or even of lack of knowledge, but it is represented as fear.
So anyone who misrepresents Islam or uses it as a negative symbol is suddenly "Islamophobic." If you want to define people in this light, I think Lewis would qualify--but only if you want to insist that certain representations of Islam are based in fear. I think for Lewis this was certainly not the case.
I will have more to say on this, want to go back and look at some passages in The Horse and His Boy and The Abolition of Man. It also seems someone wrote a critical essay on Lewis and Orientalism, will look for it in my files.
dwl
The way, the weather, the terrain, the discipline, the leadership. --Sun Tzu